What he said:
“I still do not agree to anyone writing a book in the middle of his career.”
English cricketer Kevin Pietersen makes his moments count.
After guiding Graeme Swann’s T20 side to its only victory on Indian soil in the return series, the South-African born player communicated his views about the off-spinners autobiography.
Swann criticised Pietersen’s leadership in his book, saying he should never have skippered the English side.
What he really meant:
“The chapter named Kevin Pietersen is not yet closed.”
What he definitely didn’t:
“Maybe, cricketers should take a cue from the Don (Bradman) and pen one right at the outset.”
What he said:
"I should’ve taken a patent on that shot… With so many batsmen playing it these days, I would have made a pile from the royalty."
Kevin Pietersen regrets not patenting the “Switch Hit”, a shot in which he switches grips and sides, inverting field placements and befuddling bowlers with his power hitting—equally devastating in his left-handed avatar.
What he really meant:
“The Pepsi commercial doesn’t count, of course.”
What he definitely didn’t:
“Definitely easier pickings than penning an autobiography.”
Graeme Swann Is Not a ‘Character Assassinator’
What he said:
“They would have realised it was not a character assassination.”
Graeme Swann clears the air on the controversy surrounding Kevin Pietersen’s portrayal in his autobiography, “The Breaks Are Off”.
Swann, in his book, dissed the No.4 saying he was not a natural leader and should never have been made skipper.
Swann is skipper of the T20 side and needs Kevin Pietersen to fire on all cylinders to salvage a disastrous ODI tour of India where the visitors were thrashed 5-0.
Swann said:
“My relationship with KP has unchanged. It’s fine. I am afraid people churned out stories that did not exist.”
Swann defended his characterisation of KP:
When I wrote the book it was certainly not a character assassination on anyone. It was certainly not more than myself. So I did not feel the alter the timing of its release.
It was an opinion of mine some years ago. Some people chose that for a headline of me slamming (Pietersen). A few more people could have seen it the way it was and they would have realised it was not a character assassination.
What Graeme Swann really meant:
“And they would have realised that the book is a huge bore.”
What Graeme Swann definitely didn’t:
“Kevin, how about a half-way split of the royalties?”
What he said:
“The problem with England is they have too much theory in one-day cricket.”
Saurav Ganguly analyses the reasons for England’s 4-0 washout against India in the five match ODI series in India.
The former Indian skipper was commenting on England’s unwillingness to have Ian Bell open the innings in the 50 over format.
Bell is rated the best batsman in the world by leading experts.
What he really meant:
“I’m all for anti-theory—especially when it comes to opposing sides.”
What he definitely didn’t:
“Wasn’t this the same side that beat us in the ODI series at home?”
Image via Wikipedia
What he said:
“The English media and the players have spoken too much. So what goes around comes around. The players should be careful with what they say.”
Yuvraj Singh is unable to hide his glee at the turnaround in the Indian cricket team’s fortunes.
The return ODI series against England at home was clinched in convincing fashion with the first three one-dayers going Team India’s way.
What he really meant:
“One English summer does not make a season.”
What he definitely didn’t:
“It’s not Test cricket, is it?”

What he said:
"England have been losing for the last 10 years, most of their teams, and at football also. So therefore we’re absolutely happy because we want cricket to grow in England."
New IPL Chairman, Rajeev Shukla, is a jolly good fellow.
Shukla’s horizons have broadened since ascending the BCCI ladder. The IPL chief believes that the recent victory over India at home will benefit English sport.
Shukla said:
“As far as the fans were concerned they were not very happy, but in games, defeat and victory go together, you lose and you win, that happens."
Ironically, Shukla is troubled about the deleterious effect of IPL on Test cricket:
The effect IPL is having on Test cricket is also our concern. That is why we are doing our level best to promote Test cricket now.
We are playing more Test matches, there will be a focus on the Tests. We need to promote all three forms of the game and we are not thinking only from the position of money. There may be more money in Twenty20, more money in one-day, but it does not mean that we should compromise with Test cricket.
We are thinking that we should organise more Test matches in B towns because in the populated metropolises people are always in a hurry, they’re busier, they want Twenty20, they want the one-dayer. But in B grade cities in India where they hardly get any international cricket but still have large populations, if a Test match is organised people will want to watch it.
What he really meant:
“We don’t mind losing on the field; we’re winning in the board room.”
What he definitely didn’t:
“I’m just learning the ropes; that’s the best positive spin I can put on an unmitigated disaster of a tour.”

What he said:
"I get influenced by pressure but I have so much gray hair because I don’t let expressions on field reveal this."
Indian cricket team skipper and World Cup winning champion—twice over—Mahendra Singh Dhoni discloses that he maintains his composure at all times on the field; the stress is revealed only in his prematurely grey thatch.
Dhoni credited then coach Gary Kirsten for the inspirational move up the order in the ODI World Cup final against Sri Lanka in April—a stratagem that nullified the Lankan spinners ascendance.
MSD said:
"I hadn’t planned to promote myself and play earlier. Gary asked me if I would go early. I thought with two spinners, maybe I should. It worked for me."
What Dhoni really meant:
“I’m seeking a hair dye sponsor. Godrej, come calling.”
What Dhoni definitely didn’t:
“Gray is the new black.”

Image via Wikipedia
What he said:
“The team showed character not to lose temper and still be sociable on the field."
Mahendra Singh Dhoni believes that his side may have lost the Test match and ODI series in England but they won hearts for not being sore losers.
The Indians lead 2-0 in the return ODI series—back home.
The Indian skipper was decorated with the ‘Spirit of the Game’ award at the annual ICC ceremony in September this year for his decision to allow English bat,Ian Bell, to continue his innings overturning a contentious dismissal just before the tea break during the second Test at Trent Bridge.
Ironically, Dhoni and his teammates were missing for the glittering function;Ian Bell collected the prize on his behalf.
What He Really Meant:
“We were so shell-shocked by the hammering meted out to us and the cold weather that we did not have the will to pull our hands (holding hand warmers) out of our pockets. Talk about letting off a little steam!”
What He Definitely Didn’t:
“Check out our Facebook profiles and friend our friends—the entire English squad.”

What he said:
"Its all talk, hot air. Wouldn’t want to get stuck in the argument.”
Former England skipper and commentator David Gower is dismissive of Shoaib Akhtar’s remarks concerning Sachin Tendulkar in his autobiography, “Controversially Yours”.
Gower said:
Shoaib had the talent. He was one of the quicks in his generation. He had the pace to trouble the best. Even (Vivian) Richards was troubled by pace. There was nothing new about that. But look at Sachin’s record, his thousands of runs in Test and one-day cricket…Its all hot air, irrelevant!
The left-hander with the sublime skills at the crease was equally critical of Akhtar’s suggestion that ball-tampering be sanctioned:
I understand what they are saying but there has to be a line somewhere. Its like legalising good ivory. It will increase poaching anyway. If you say its okay to do tampering, you will get a lot of tamperers. It will encourage cheating.
What he really meant:
“Shoaib’s blowing hot and then cold on Tendulkar makes this a non-starter. Do we really need to take this topic further?”
What he definitely didn’t:
“I’m a batsman. Do you seriously expect me to take a bowler’s side—on this? I can still recall quaking in my boots when we had the West Indian quartet of fast bowlers at our throats in the 80s. It’s the stuff of nightmares.”

What he said:
“I lose my rag fairly easily, so the captains I’ve enjoyed playing under are the ones who don’t get flustered in the middle even when the pressure is on.”
Graeme Swann expounds on his reasons why Kevin Pietersen was not the right choice for skipper of the English cricket side.
Swann wrote—in the Sun:
There is no doubt Kevin Pietersen is a really fine batsman but he was never the right man to captain England.
Some people are better leaders of men and Kev, for all his talent, is not one of those natural leaders.
The English off-spinner further elaborated that he needed someone “who can calm me down”.
Swann said—of Pietersen:
“At one point in India, his leadership was reduced to screaming ‘F****** bowl f****** straight’ at everyone.”
Swann contrasts Andrew Strauss’ leadership saying “he is one of those guys who demands respect.”
The No. 1 Test bowler in the world commended Strauss:
He always says the right things and his word is never questioned.
If you were in the trenches, you’d pick him to be in charge and his captaincy is founded on leading from the front. He can be hard-nosed, too, if necessary.
What Graeme Swann really meant:
“You can rest assured asking me to ‘F****** bowl f****** straight’ got me to do anything but that.”
What Graeme Swann definitely didn’t:
“Just give us a ‘F****** skipper’—as long as it’s not me.”